Xbox suggests that PlayStation should make its own Call of Duty
Xbox and PlayStation continue to argue as they will finally determine whether the Activision-Blizzard acquisition would give Microsoft an unfair market advantage. And if the purchase will finally be completed or not.
Phil Spencer, reiterated several times that the franchise will not become an Xbox exclusive, Sony is not comfortable at all. Previously, Sony stated that it believes Call of Duty is “an essential game: a blockbuster, AAA type game that has no rival.”
However, “At the Remedies Hearing, Microsoft was asked by the Competition and Markets Authority whether the 10-year duration is sufficient and whether there would be a ‘borderline’ for Sony at the end of this period. The 10 year period is [redactado]”, Microsoft wrote in the document. “Microsoft believes that a period of 10 years is sufficient for Sony, as a leading publisher and console platform, to develop alternatives to Call of Duty.“. via VGC.
“The 10-year term will be extended to the next generation of consoles [redactado]”, he continued. “Furthermore, the practical effect of the remedy will go beyond the 10-year period, as games downloaded in the last year of the remedy can continue to be played for the life of that console (and beyond, with backwards compatibility).”.
Again, it doesn’t seem likely that Sony will follow this advice. Previously, the company said: “Call of Duty is not replicable. Call of Duty is too entrenched for any rival, no matter how well equipped, to catch up.” He also specifically called out EA’s Battlefield franchise as an example of a series that simply “can’t keep upfrom Call of Duty.
We will have to keep an eye on this space since the CMA’s final report on the agreement is due on April 26 of this year.